| 
         New
        Federal Tax Rules Clarify Home Sale Capital Gains Exclusions 
        by Kenneth R. Harney 
        www.realtytimes.com
         
        After nearly three years of uncertainty, the IRS has now delivered
        the answers to questions that have bedeviled home sellers, Realtors and
        professional tax advisers. In year-end regulations, the IRS clarified
        its rules on capital gains exclusions for profits on home sales. 
        The largest category of people affected are those who sell their
        homes prior to the standard two-year holding period required for the
        maximum capital gains exclusions of $250,000 (single filers) and
        $500,000 (married, joint filers). The standard rules allow sellers to
        exclude up to those maximum amounts of sale profits provided they have
        owned and used their property as a principal residence for an aggregate
        two out of the five years preceding the sale. Any profits beyond the
        exclusion amounts are taxed at capital gains rates.
         For taxpayers who sell after ownership and use of less than two
        years, Congress created a partial exclusion or shelter back in
        1997-1998: You can claim a portion of the maximum exclusion if you sell
        early because of a change in employment, a change in health, or because
        of "unforeseen circumstances." For example, a single homeowner
        who sold his property for a profit after just one year because of a
        corporte transfer could claim one half of the full $250,000 stamdard
        exclusion--$125,000.
         In the absence of formal regulatory guidance from the IRS
        interpreting employment change, health change and "unforeseen
        circumstances," many taxpayers have been reluctant to use the
        partial exclusion. The IRS itself warned taxpayers not to claim
        "unforeseen circumstances" on their returns until the agency
        itself spelled out precisely what circumstances qualify.
         Now the IRS has done so with interim rules, opening the door to
        partial exclusion claims for tax year 2002 and any prior year's returns
        where a refund may be available under the new rules. (For such
        situations, taxpayers can file for refunds using Form 1040X.)
         On "unforeseen circumstances," the IRS lists seven major
        categories that create a "safe harbor" that automatically
        makes the claim eligible:
         
          - Death of the taxpayer, a spouse, a co-owner or any member of the
            taxpayer's household.
          
 - Divorce or legal separation.
          
 - A job loss that results in eligibility for unemployment
            compensation.
          
 - A change in employment that leaves the taxpayer unable to pay the
            mortgage or basic living expenses.
          
 - Multiple births from the same pregnancy;
          
 - Damage to the residence resulting from a natural or man-made
            disaster, or an act of war or terrorism.
          
 - Condemnation, seizure or other involuntary conversion of the
            property.
 
         
        The regulations also give the IRS commissioner the discretion to
        determine other circumstances that qualify as unforeseeen.
         On employment changes that trigger early sales, the IRS rule is
        straightforward: "A home sale will be considered related to a chane
        in employment if a qualified person's new place of work is at least 50
        miles farther from the old home than the old workplace was from that
        home. This is the same distance rule that applies for the moving expense
        deduction. The employment change must occur during the taxpayer's
        ownership and use of the home as a residence.
         The new rules allow a partial exclusion for health if "the
        primary reason is related to a disease, illness or injury" of the
        home seller or member of the household. If a physician recommends a
        change in residence for health reasons, that will be sufficient to claim
        the exclusion. 
           |